Are Mormons Christian?

Mormons call themselves Christians. They talk about the gospel, being saved by the grace of Jesus Christ, and even claim belief in the Bible. Their nicely dressed Screen Shot 2017-07-23 at 9.08.57 AM.pngmissionaries are respectful and kind, yet their exact beliefs are often a mystery to those outside of the Church of Latter Day Saints. Some refer to the Mormon church as a cult while others believe that the Church of Latter-Day Saints is simply another denomination of Christianity. So which is it? This post brings clarity by comparing the core teachings of the Church of Latter-Day Saints to biblical teachings about the same matters. Those theological teachings include: The nature of God, Jesus, eternal salvation, and Creation.

The founder of the LDS church, Joseph Smith (1805-1844), penned the book of Mormon and taught several sermons that were influential in the formation of Mormon doctrine and thought. In one of his best known sermons, entitled The King Follet Discourse*, he taught what he considered to be true about the nature of God, how God came to be, and how Mormons will one day themselves become a God. In that sermon, Joseph said, “God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man…I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form…We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea…God himself, as the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did…” Joseph Smith’s claim was that God began as a man who was eventually exalted to the position of God in the same way that Jesus was a man who was eventually exalted to godship. Joseph taught that Yahweh was one of many gods, as is Jesus.

In Isaiah 45:6, we read where God said, “I am the LORD, and there is none other, besides me there is no God.” Deuteronomy 4:35, “Yahweh, He is God; there is no other besides Him.” Isaiah 45:21, “There is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; there is none except me.” 1 Timothy 1:17, “Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible the only God.” It is clear that Christianity teaches that there is only one God and that there is none other. The Bible teaches that he is the only eternal God, which means he had no beginning, nor was he ever a finite man. Furthermore, Jesus claimed to be one with God in John 10:30. To dispel any ideas that he was a created finite man, he even said, “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58). Of course, “I am,” was the name that Yahweh gave to himself in Exodus 3:14, which is why the Jews picked up stones with which to stone Jesus for what they believed to be blasphemy following his claim to be the eternal I am.

Doctrine of God Contrast: Joseph Smith taught that Yahweh had a beginning and that he was a man before he became one of many gods, as did Jesus. In contrast, the Bible teaches that Yahweh is the only eternal God. Joseph Smith also seemed to understand Jesus to have been a separate God from Yahweh, yet the Bible teaches that Jesus is one with the Yahweh.

In the King Follet Discourse, Joseph Smith also discussed salvation. “Here, then, is eternal life- to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves…as all gods have done before you…until you attain the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory as do those Screen Shot 2017-07-23 at 9.11.21 AM.pngwho sit enthroned in everlasting power…so it is with the principles of the gospel – you must begin with the first, and go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation.” Smith taught that salvation entails humans becoming gods through the process of exaltation. In his belief, he taught that there are many gods and that there will be many more. In the book of Mormon, he also wrote, “…for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.”** Smith taught that humans must do works, which are accompanied by God’s grace, through their process of exaltation and unto salvation. Therefore, his definition of salvation is not achieved by grace alone, but by “grace after all we can do.”

However, because the Bible teaches that there is one God, as we saw in the previous section, biblical salvation does cannot be understood to mean that humans “humans [become] gods through the process of exaltation” as Joseph Smith taught. Instead, Revelation 21:3-4 describes the eternal state of those who receive salvation from God. It reads, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will with them, and they will be his people and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall they be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” While there are more biblical teachings about Heaven, it is clear that humans will not be exalted to deity or become gods. Instead, they will remain human beings with glorified eternal bodies and will dwell with the one true God for eternity. Concerning how Christians receive salvation, Paul wrote in Ephesians 2:8-9, “For grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.”

Doctrine of Salvation Contrast: Joseph Smith taught that salvation entails human beings working through the process of exaltation to become gods. He taught that they do not achieve salvation as a gift from God or by grace alone. Rather, Smith taught that men must do works in conjuntion with God’s grace to reach salvation, or exaltation, and to become gods as have all of the other gods. This doctrine makes clear that Mormonism is not a monotheist faith. Instead, it is a polytheistic religion with innumerable gods. In contrast to Joseph Smith, the Bible teaches a monotheistic message that establishes that humans will never become like God, nor will they reach a state of deity. Instead, they will live with God in eternity as children of the King, who have been rescued from an eternal separation from Him through faith in Jesus. The Bible teaches that this salvation has nothing to do with the works of man – it is a free gift from God.

Finally, Smith provided his insights on Creation in the King Follet Discourse. He said, “In the beginning, the head of the Gods called a council of the Gods; and they came together and concocted a plan to create a world and people in it…Now I ask why the learned men who are preaching salvation, say that God created the heavens and the earth our of nothing? The reason, that they are unlearned in the things of God and have not the gift of the Holy Ghost… But I am learned, and know more than all the world put together…we infer that God had materials to organize the world out of chaos – chaotic matter…”Screen Shot 2017-07-23 at 10.51.17 AM.png

Contrary to Smith’s teaching, the Bible teaches that in the beginning God created the universe. There was no council of gods involved in his decision making process, nor did they exist. There was only Yahweh. Furthermore, Hebrews 11:3 tells us that “the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible,” so God’s creating was a much greater miracle than simply organizing chaotic material. God spoke and the universe came into existence.

Doctrine of Creation Contrast: Smith’s polytheistic beliefs informed his belief that Yahweh conferred with other gods prior to creating the universe out of previously existing materials. In contrast, the strictly monotheistic message of the Bible teaches that Yahweh created the universe from nothing more than his Word, which John 1 teaches was personified in Jesus.

Conclusion: Joseph Smith and the Latter-Day Saints teach much about core Christian doctrines (i.e. God, Jesus, the gospel, salvation, and creation). However, while their terminology is very similar to that of biblical Christianity, their teachings about those core Christian doctrines often seem to be in opposition to what is plainly stated in the Bible. 

“There will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who brought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed.” 2 Peter 2:1-2





Abortion is a Woman’s Right…right?

This following is discussion of the six most common lies that I hear recited from my pro-choice friends – although to their credits I do think that they believe these lies and do not lie intentionally. This is one of my lengthier posts, but I hope that you’ll read and consider each of these short discussions. Also, I invite you to respond where you disagree – just try to do it without making unsubstantiated assertions or emotional pleas.

Lie #1: Abortion is a woman’s right.

That is to say, “It is a woman’s right to intentionally kill her unborn child.” That is no Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 9.35.06 AM.pngdifferent than believing, “I have a right to the pursuit of happiness and you inhibit my happiness, therefore, I have the right to kill you.” That’s absurd! A person’s (i.e. baby’s) right to life is more sacred than all other rights and should be held above any other competing “right” held by another person. Therefore, a baby’s right to life trumps any competing “right” or desire of its mother.

Lie #2: Abortion is legal, so there’s nothing wrong with it.

Slavery was once legal and Jews were legally exterminated during the Holocaust. Was either of those black marks on human history right, or even morally neutral, since they were legal at the time? Ironically, pro-choice advocates are using similar “personhood” arguments to those that were used by the supporters of slavery in America and by the Nazis in Germany. Though the Holocaust and slavery were legal in their respective lands and at their respective times, we can all agree that they were equally as wrong then as they would be now. Might does not make right.

Alongside this lie often comes the argument that “If abortion is made illegal, then they will just be performed in ‘back alleys’, instead of ‘clinics’, and women will die due to poor care.” First, I do not think nearly as many women would seek abortions if such procedures were not as readily available. Secondly and more importantly, I say, “Ok.” Murders should only be committed in back alleys and under the cover of darkness, instead of in the open and in front of approving bystanders. I’m not arguing that it would be good for women to be hurt by complications due to “back alley abortions”; however, I am saying that it does not follow that we should collectively bless murderous activity because, otherwise, those involved with it will choose to do so in less safe environments where they could potentially get hurt, too. Evil should always be forced into the back alleys of culture, instead of celebrated on Main Street.

Lie #3: It’s a woman’s body, so abortion is her choice!

Wrong. From the time of conception, the unborn child is her own entity with her own unique DNA and genetic makeup that will never change or develop any further. All that changes from the time of conception until her natural death due to old age is her: Size, level of physical development, external environment, and her degree of dependency on Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 9.42.05 AM.pngother people. As she continues to develop in the womb, a baby girl develops her own organ system, feelings, and even thoughts (yes, there is evidence that suggests babies are capable of dreaming within their mother’s wombs). An unborn girl is NOT a part of a woman’s body – it is simply reliant on the mother so that she can continue to live. The same is true of a one year old child and we agree that it is wrong to kill her simply because she cannot survive on her own.

Lie #4: It’s not a human person – it’s just a clump of cells.

Modern science is clearly refutes this lie. Pro-choice advocates must ignore modern science to tell this lie, yet they continue do so. Consider the following:Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 9.49.04 AM.png

Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth (Harvard Medical School) “It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at the point of conception.

Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni (University of Pennsylvania) “…I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and that any interruption and any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life…”

Professor Hymie Gordon (Founder of the Mayo Clinic’s Medical Genetics Program) “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”

Lie #4: Abortions are a better option than to have children born into poverty, or forced into the        foster system.

Following it to its logical conclusion most easily refutes this lie. Simply ask, “So would it follow that it would also be best for us to kill the kids who are already born and who are currently living in poverty, or in the foster system? Would they be better off if they were dead?” Of course not! Kids in poverty stricken areas and those who grow up in foster care are of no lesser value than are kids who have been born to wealthier family units. The pro-choice advocate would likely respond to this line of reasoning by claiming that Lie #4 is not about the “value” of a child, rather it’s about saving a child from a life of what we consider to be “poor quality.” To this logic I would respond, “If quality of life is determined by social status and wealth, then please explain to me why the suicide rate among the wealthy is exponentially higher than the suicide rate among those whom we would claim have a “poorer quality” of life.” The answer: Because quality of life has very little to do with social statuses and wealth.

Lie #5: Abortion is acceptable in cases of rape or incest.

Another way to pitch this lie would be to say, “The child deserves to be killed because her father committed a horrible crime.” That would be viewed as a terrible idea in any other situation. It’s a curious thing that we would seek to justify sentencing a baby girl to die because her father committed the crime of rape, yet her father cannot even legally be sentenced to death for his crime! When presented this lie, one should remind the pro-choice advocate that statistics demonstrate that less than 1% of abortions in the U.S. are performed because of rape or incest and then ask, “Would you be willing to grant that all other abortions not performed due to rape or incest are wrong?” I’m almost certain the answer will be “no,” which demonstrates that this lie does not even represent their true reasoning for being pro-choice. This lie is just a distraction tactic. It is not lost on me how difficult rape or incest would be on the victim of such a crime. Indeed, it would be incredibly difficult on everyone impacted, yet the fact remains that killing an innocent baby will not remove the emotional pain that the victim feels, nor will it bring justice to the wrong that has been committed against her – it will only kill an innocent child.

Lie #6: Abortions are sometimes necessary to save the life of the mother.

Abortion can be defined as the intentional taking the life of an unborn baby. Similar to the argument concerning rape or incest, this lie is nothing more than an attempt to justify 99% of abortions based on less than 1% of cases. However, there are rare times that ectopic pregnancies do happen and in which the mother’s life and the baby’s life are in grave danger. In those rare moments, the doctor has the option of either losing both of his patients, or performing a life saving procedure that will be able to save one of his patients. In those situations, the doctor is not intentionally taking the life of an unborn baby – he is performing a life saving measure to save the dying baby’s mother. The unfortunate reality concerning this procedure is that it has not yet been developed to the extent that enables the doctor to simultaneously save the baby’s life. Lie #6 is false because the doctor in this situation is not acting with malicious forethought to intentionally take a life, aka performing an abortion. Instead, he is acting with the sole intention of saving the only life that could be saved in a very sad and unavoidable situation.

Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 10.22.14 AM.png

I hope it’s now clear to you that our country is sacrificing its children on the alters of profit and convenience. We cannot continue to mindlessly accept and regurgitate the lies that are used to justify their slaughter. Instead, Christians, we must share the life and forgiveness that is found in Jesus, as well as our personal love and support, with women who are in difficult pregnancy situations. We must also pray for the overturning of Roe v Wade and take every possible measure to make sure it is overturned as we intentionally and boldly refute pro-choice lies at every opportunity. If you call yourself pro-life and do none of those things, then you have not been pro-life – you have at very best been indifferent. It’s time for a course correction.

The Real Jesus

Since the passing of the new “Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act,” in Mississippi, social media posts have created a concern in me. This concern has not been on the basis of what most people do, or do not, like about the bill itself. Instead, my concern stems from the claims being made about “Jesus” that demonstrate the ignorance of many “Christians” concerning Jesus and his teachings. That ignorance reminds me that there are many people claiming to be Christians, who worship their own ideas of Jesus, instead of the real Jesus. The difference in one’s “own ideas of Jesus” and the real Jesus is that one is a false idol and one is the true God. That concern is my reason for writing this post: To encourage Christians to take a moment to examine themselves, as 2 Corinthians 13:5 encourages them to do. This examination is vital so that they can be certain that they are worshipping the true Jesus, instead of a false god made in the image of themselves and of the way that they think that they would rule if they were God. Jesus said that many will come to him on the Day of Judgment and claim that they knew him, but that he will tell them to go away from him because that they never really knew him (Matthew 7:21-23). That means that a popular line of thought that that states, “We’re all children of God and Jesus would never turn anyone away,” must be categorically rejected as Universalism (a system that fails miserably when practically considered), instead of Christianity. This is why it is imperative that people be certain that they are not believing in a false “Jesus,” which will only lead them to a tragic end on the day when they meet the real One.

Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Jesus did not claim that he was one of many ways, or one of many truths. Rather, he made the claim that he was the only exclusive way to God and the only source of truth, which removes the ability of any true follower of his to advocate for the belief that he is “right for them, but other ways are right for other people.” Furthermore, Jesus told us that we would know that we were really following him, which implies that some people will think that they are his followers and be mistaken, is if we hold to his teaching (John 8:31). That means that Christians, in the most generic sense of the word, who dilute Jesus’ teachings in an effort to make him seem more inclusive and palatable than he ever claimed to be are not following the real Jesus.

For those reasons, it is vitally important that Christians actually read God’s Word – the Bible! How should one expect that his belief in Jesus is belief in the real Jesus if his beliefs are based solely on his own thoughts about “Jesus” and the claims printed on coffee cups and Facebook statuses about Jesus? If the real Jesus is God, as he claimed to be, then he is, by definition, the greatest Being in the Universe. If you find that you have no desire to spend your own personal time growing in your understanding of him, as well as changing your beliefs, habits, and lifestyle in accordance with the things you learn about him, then it is highly probable that you do not really know him at all.

One recurring claim about Jesus that I have found to be correct is that “Jesus is love.” That claim is true! In his love, Jesus revealed to us the one exclusive way to God, which should also lovingly guide us away from the other “ways” that are false and will lead to our destruction. That explains why it is fallacious to assume that Jesus would not be “loving” if he did not “accept everyone.” The fact is that he humbled himself and became a man in order to make a way for us to be reconciled to God. He did that instead of leaving us to our own demise, which he had every right to do. That is true love! If people willfully reject the way that he has made – even if while doing so they don the title of “Christian” – then it will not be due to a lack of love on Jesus’ part when he eventually says, “depart from me,” on the day they are called to give account for their lives. Instead, his “lack of acceptance” will be due to each unbelieving person’s self-determination to function as his own god while on earth and, thereby, to reject Jesus as God. That is why I urge you to submit to the real Jesus while you still have time. Anyone who knows me knows that I have not always loved Jesus. In fact, there was a time that I would have told you that I hated God. However, he continued to love and pursue me and I have found that there is no greater joy and contentment than what I have experienced since I began following the real Jesus. Let’s be honest – you’re a poor excuse for a god and you have a history of making a mess of things. I encourage you to submit yourself to the one true God, as he has revealed himself, and to take the burden off of yourself! You’ll be glad you did.